I have a rather left-field theory about the identity of Benedict Cumberbatch's character in the upcoming Star Trek movie. I'd originally mentioned this - in jest - in a comment on a friend's Facebook post when the first trailer came out. But now that we have the extended trailer from some Hobbit screenings and a newly-started backstory comic, I haven't seen anything that convinces me that I'm wrong and I want to get it in print in the unlikely event that they turn out to be crazy enough to do this.
I'm the the first to admit that it would it would be impossible to reconcile this theory with the original canon without some spectacularly unlikely plot devices. But then I think back to pretty much all of the second act of the last Star Trek movie. You remember, all the scenes on Delta Vega where Kirk's pod, Spock Prime's cave shelter, a convenient spot to watch the planet Vulcan where it occupies more of the sky than our moon occupies ours, Scotty's outpost, and a suspiciously Cloverfield-like monster all wind up within easy hiking distance of each other, uphill, both ways, in the snow.
And I think, yeah. Spectacularly unlikely plot devices? Really not a problem. Yeah.
The perversely brilliant part of the whole thing is that, while it could correctly be seen as a giant middle finger extended to any remaining original-continuity partisans, Abrams could say with complete butter-wouldn't-melt-in-his-mouth honesty that "he was only answering a question fans have asked and debated, literally, for decades."
[ Who would win in a fight between Kirk... and Picard?
We've been told Cumberbatch's character will have occurred in the original canon; Picard (ignoring temporal issues for the moment) qualifies. The promos describe "a threat from within their own organization," and Picard is (ok, will be) "within their own organization." Movieline points out that the first backstory comic that was just released introduces Robert April, a former Enterprise captain as of Kirk's era, and theorizes that he might be Cumberbatch's character. But the comic character looks nothing like Cumberbatch, even considering artistic license. On the other hand, if we're setting up some sort of "nexus of Enterprise captains" - well, that's not inconsistent with my theory, now is it?
So, yes, according to canon, Picard hadn't even been born during the events of the original series, much less already been a young member of Starfleet. And I'm not sure how you'd motivate Picard-as-vengeful-villain.
But listen to the "announcement" trailer again with your eyes closed. Listen to that sonorously British intonation and tell me you honestly don't hear Picard now. Tell me that if you were actually trying to find an actor to recreate a younger version of Picard the way, say, Karl Urban does DeForest Kelly's McCoy, that you honestly wouldn't shortlist Cumberbatch.

cello and